NACP NACP
A-
A
A+
A
A
Звичайна версія сайту

Development of the institution of whistleblowing: how to legislate the status of a whistleblower in criminal proceedings?  

27.03.2024
6ab80291bfeeb53f0dabc4ad83a5c9ec178592a5f578c046097277e7b270aa05-900x400

Differences in the definition of corruption whistleblowers in the current legislation prevent the formation of a unified approach to working with this category of persons, and proper protection of their rights and guarantees. According to the State Anti-Corruption Program (clause 1.6.3.3.1.) in order to solve this problem, the National Agency on Corruption Prevention (NACP) should develop a draft law that, in particular, provides for the introduction of a broad definition of "whistleblower".  

Thus, in the national legislation, the term "whistleblower" is defined in the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption" (hereinafter - the Law) and the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine (hereinafter - the CPC).

The Law defines a whistleblower as a person who has reported facts of corruption that became known to him or her under certain conditions, namely in connection with his or her labor, professional, economic, public, scientific activities, service or training, or his or her participation in procedures provided for by law that are mandatory for the commencement of such activities, service or training.

At the same time, according to the CPC, a whistleblower is a person who has filed a statement or report of a corruption criminal offense with a pre-trial investigation body.

As it can be seen, the CPC of Ukraine does not duplicate the definition of "whistleblower" and does not contain a mandatory condition on the list of sources from which the whistleblower can learn information about corruption (labor, professional, economic, social, scientific activities, etc.). In other words, in this case, the legislator defines a whistleblower as a complainant in criminal proceedings.

However, the status of a whistleblower does not correspond to the essence of a whistleblower, and narrows his or her rights and obligations, as well as guarantees. 

The applicant's rights defined in the CPC fully apply to the whistleblower, and the applicant who is a whistleblower additionally has the right to receive information on the status of the pre-trial investigation initiated upon his or her application or report. In practice, however, it is quite difficult for a whistleblower to obtain any information on the status of the pre-trial investigation in criminal proceedings.

When determining the status of a whistleblower, the investigator/detective has a wide discretion, which gives rise to corruption risks. The pre-trial investigation agencies still do not have a unified approach to registering criminal proceedings involving whistleblowers, as the relevant information in the Unified Register of Pre-trial Investigations does not usually reflect the participation of a whistleblower in criminal proceedings.

Since the NACP plays a key role in the institutional mechanism for protecting whistleblower rights, the CPC provides for the obligation of the investigator to notify the National Agency in writing of the start of a pre-trial investigation involving a whistleblower after entering the relevant information into the Unified Register of Pre-trial Investigations. At the same time, the NACP is not a party to criminal proceedings and has no authority to assess the investigator's actions or inaction in terms of ensuring the rights and guarantees of whistleblowers.

That is why whistleblowers are hostage to the investigator's subjective vision of their legal status in criminal proceedings, which affects their safety and protection from possible negative measures (dismissal, disciplinary proceedings, etc.) related to their reporting to pre-trial investigation agencies. 

For citizens who have chosen to fight corruption, this has negative consequences, primarily the inability to enjoy "whistleblower immunity." In addition, failure to obtain the status of a whistleblower does not allow such a person to exercise the right to remuneration. 

To solve the problem, it is necessary to introduce a unified concept of a whistleblower, in particular by harmonizing the definition of this term in the CPC (clause 162, part 1, article 3) with the corresponding norm of the Law (paragraph 20, part 1, article 1)

This will introduce a unified approach to the registration and pre-trial investigation of criminal proceedings involving whistleblowers and, accordingly, provide them with protection both within and outside of criminal proceedings.

Within its competence, the NACP is developing the necessary amendments to the legislation and counts on the support of this initiative from the stakeholders. 

Read more about this issue.

Latest News

01.04.2025
14:36
Declaration Campaign 2024: almost 627 thousand public servants have submitted their declarations
31.03.2025
17:07
Norway will support the NACP in the development and implementation of corruption risk studies in the defence sector
17:03
Ukraine implements OECD anti-corruption standards with measured policies and improved tools - Victor Pavlushchyk
28.03.2025
18:00
Full text of the interview with NACP Head Viktor Pavlushchyk for NV
16:15
NACP will join the control and evaluation of the anti-corruption experiment in the tax service
27.03.2025
18:00
Audit of the organisation of corruption prevention work in the State Judicial Administration: formal approach to the development of the anti-corruption programme and non-transparent procurement
26.03.2025
18:00
Conflict of interest: NACP files a report to court against ex-head of Vasylkiv City District Court in Kyiv region
16:31
UAH 5.6 million of unjustified assets of the head of the State Migration Service in Odesa region were confiscated
25.03.2025
18:15
Reconstruction, public procurement, fortifications are the areas with the highest corruption risks in Zaporizhzhia region
24.03.2025
12:45
Civil forfeiture: UAH 7 million may be confiscated from an official of the State Tax Service of Ukraine to the state budget
21.03.2025
10:15
Anti-corruption mainstreaming: Deputy Head of the NACP presents recommendations for preparing materials for the European Commission
20.03.2025
12:42
10 years of NACP: symbols approved, commemorative medal and postage stamps issued
19.03.2025
11:17
A decade of reforms and transformations: NACP - from establishment to specific results
17.03.2025
15:02
Anti-corruption commissioners: tasks, responsibilities and tools for effective conflict of interest regulation
13.03.2025
16:49
Violations worth more than UAH 605 million were detected by the NACP as a result of full verification of declarations in February
13:01
Ukrainians' real experience of corruption is more than four times lower than the estimate of corruption prevalence: research findings
12.03.2025
10:46
NACP holds the largest seminar on declaration for public officials
11.03.2025
17:45
NACP invites the public to electronic consultations on the draft law on improvement of special inspections
10.03.2025
16:47
Conflicts of interest: reasoned conclusions, protocols and court decisions
15:12
Car worth UAH 2 million may be confiscated from Chernihiv regional council deputy to the state revenue based on NACP materials
Чат-бот Telegram
contact center
Чат-бот Telegram
Contacts
+38 (044) 200-06-94 info@nazk.gov.ua
працює з 9:00 до 18:00
Технічна підтримка
support@nazk.gov.ua