NACP NACP
A-
A
A+
A
A
Звичайна версія сайту

Development of the institution of whistleblowing: how to legislate the status of a whistleblower in criminal proceedings?  

27.03.2024
6ab80291bfeeb53f0dabc4ad83a5c9ec178592a5f578c046097277e7b270aa05-900x400

Differences in the definition of corruption whistleblowers in the current legislation prevent the formation of a unified approach to working with this category of persons, and proper protection of their rights and guarantees. According to the State Anti-Corruption Program (clause 1.6.3.3.1.) in order to solve this problem, the National Agency on Corruption Prevention (NACP) should develop a draft law that, in particular, provides for the introduction of a broad definition of "whistleblower".  

Thus, in the national legislation, the term "whistleblower" is defined in the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption" (hereinafter - the Law) and the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine (hereinafter - the CPC).

The Law defines a whistleblower as a person who has reported facts of corruption that became known to him or her under certain conditions, namely in connection with his or her labor, professional, economic, public, scientific activities, service or training, or his or her participation in procedures provided for by law that are mandatory for the commencement of such activities, service or training.

At the same time, according to the CPC, a whistleblower is a person who has filed a statement or report of a corruption criminal offense with a pre-trial investigation body.

As it can be seen, the CPC of Ukraine does not duplicate the definition of "whistleblower" and does not contain a mandatory condition on the list of sources from which the whistleblower can learn information about corruption (labor, professional, economic, social, scientific activities, etc.). In other words, in this case, the legislator defines a whistleblower as a complainant in criminal proceedings.

However, the status of a whistleblower does not correspond to the essence of a whistleblower, and narrows his or her rights and obligations, as well as guarantees. 

The applicant's rights defined in the CPC fully apply to the whistleblower, and the applicant who is a whistleblower additionally has the right to receive information on the status of the pre-trial investigation initiated upon his or her application or report. In practice, however, it is quite difficult for a whistleblower to obtain any information on the status of the pre-trial investigation in criminal proceedings.

When determining the status of a whistleblower, the investigator/detective has a wide discretion, which gives rise to corruption risks. The pre-trial investigation agencies still do not have a unified approach to registering criminal proceedings involving whistleblowers, as the relevant information in the Unified Register of Pre-trial Investigations does not usually reflect the participation of a whistleblower in criminal proceedings.

Since the NACP plays a key role in the institutional mechanism for protecting whistleblower rights, the CPC provides for the obligation of the investigator to notify the National Agency in writing of the start of a pre-trial investigation involving a whistleblower after entering the relevant information into the Unified Register of Pre-trial Investigations. At the same time, the NACP is not a party to criminal proceedings and has no authority to assess the investigator's actions or inaction in terms of ensuring the rights and guarantees of whistleblowers.

That is why whistleblowers are hostage to the investigator's subjective vision of their legal status in criminal proceedings, which affects their safety and protection from possible negative measures (dismissal, disciplinary proceedings, etc.) related to their reporting to pre-trial investigation agencies. 

For citizens who have chosen to fight corruption, this has negative consequences, primarily the inability to enjoy "whistleblower immunity." In addition, failure to obtain the status of a whistleblower does not allow such a person to exercise the right to remuneration. 

To solve the problem, it is necessary to introduce a unified concept of a whistleblower, in particular by harmonizing the definition of this term in the CPC (clause 162, part 1, article 3) with the corresponding norm of the Law (paragraph 20, part 1, article 1)

This will introduce a unified approach to the registration and pre-trial investigation of criminal proceedings involving whistleblowers and, accordingly, provide them with protection both within and outside of criminal proceedings.

Within its competence, the NACP is developing the necessary amendments to the legislation and counts on the support of this initiative from the stakeholders. 

Read more about this issue.

Latest News

17.09.2025
18:00
Assets worth UAH 1.6 million were recovered to the state budget from a prosecutor of the Office of the Prosecutor General based on NACP materials
16.09.2025
18:45
Tax reform: implementation of anti-corruption mechanisms discussed at NACP
16:06
Anti-Corruption Expertise: NACP provided recommendations to eliminate corruption risks in the areas of housing for internally displaced persons, property relations and reintegration of defenders
15.09.2025
14:30
The Government approved three anti-corruption draft laws: NACP special verifications, civil confiscation in HACC, amendments to the Code of Administrative Offenses and the Criminal Procedure Code
12.09.2025
18:00
Failure to declare property worth over UAH 3.1 million: as a result of a full audit, the case against the energy supervision inspector has been referred to court
15:46
Civil confiscation of UAH 3.2 million from the Chief Sanitary Doctor of Ukraine: results of the full declaration audit
15:30
Anti-Corruption Expertise: NACP Joined the Implementation of a Unified Standard and Remote Procedure for the Military Medical Commission
15:30
Full audits of declarations for August 2025: NACP detected violations exceeding UAH 337 million
11.09.2025
16:30
Full audits: NACP found false information worth over UAH 3.1 million in the declaration of the former head of the regional service center of the Ministry of Internal Affairs
15:00
Lifestyle monitoring: UAH 7 million may be recovered to the state budget from the former head of the capital's district administration
11:00
Lifestyle monitoring: over UAH 8 million could be seized from an official of the Donetsk State Environmental Inspectorate in favor of the state
09.09.2025
15:00
Disillusionment, information attacks and attention to the authorities: how Ukrainian media and social networks covered the topic of corruption in the second quarter of 2025
09:59
NACP statement on certain results of lifestyle monitoring and possible impact on the Agency’s activities
08.09.2025
16:45
Lifestyle monitoring: UAH 8.6 million could be confiscated from an official of the Ministry of Internal Affairs Service Center in favor of the state
16:00
Conflict of interest: a protocol against a judge, substantiated conclusions regarding Kyiv City State Administration officials and disciplinary actions in August
15:15
NACP has launched the development of a new Communication Strategy in the field of preventing and combating corruption with the involvement of key stakeholders
05.09.2025
11:30
Two years of operation of the Whistleblower reporting portal: outcomes, challenges and prospects
04.09.2025
18:00
Full audit of declarations: a case concerning an official of the State Regulatory Service has been referred to court for false declaration
16:47
Lifestyle monitoring: court seized the property of a district state administration official in Kyiv - a business-class apartment and millions in bank accounts
02.09.2025
15:20
Government bodies have implemented nearly 46% of the measures outlined in the State Anti-Corruption Program
Чат-бот Telegram
contact center
Чат-бот Telegram
Contacts
+38 (044) 200-06-94 info@nazk.gov.ua
працює з 9:00 до 18:00
Технічна підтримка
support@nazk.gov.ua