NACP NACP
A-
A
A+
A
A
Звичайна версія сайту

Development of the institution of whistleblowing: how to legislate the status of a whistleblower in criminal proceedings?  

27.03.2024
6ab80291bfeeb53f0dabc4ad83a5c9ec178592a5f578c046097277e7b270aa05-900x400

Differences in the definition of corruption whistleblowers in the current legislation prevent the formation of a unified approach to working with this category of persons, and proper protection of their rights and guarantees. According to the State Anti-Corruption Program (clause 1.6.3.3.1.) in order to solve this problem, the National Agency on Corruption Prevention (NACP) should develop a draft law that, in particular, provides for the introduction of a broad definition of "whistleblower".  

Thus, in the national legislation, the term "whistleblower" is defined in the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption" (hereinafter - the Law) and the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine (hereinafter - the CPC).

The Law defines a whistleblower as a person who has reported facts of corruption that became known to him or her under certain conditions, namely in connection with his or her labor, professional, economic, public, scientific activities, service or training, or his or her participation in procedures provided for by law that are mandatory for the commencement of such activities, service or training.

At the same time, according to the CPC, a whistleblower is a person who has filed a statement or report of a corruption criminal offense with a pre-trial investigation body.

As it can be seen, the CPC of Ukraine does not duplicate the definition of "whistleblower" and does not contain a mandatory condition on the list of sources from which the whistleblower can learn information about corruption (labor, professional, economic, social, scientific activities, etc.). In other words, in this case, the legislator defines a whistleblower as a complainant in criminal proceedings.

However, the status of a whistleblower does not correspond to the essence of a whistleblower, and narrows his or her rights and obligations, as well as guarantees. 

The applicant's rights defined in the CPC fully apply to the whistleblower, and the applicant who is a whistleblower additionally has the right to receive information on the status of the pre-trial investigation initiated upon his or her application or report. In practice, however, it is quite difficult for a whistleblower to obtain any information on the status of the pre-trial investigation in criminal proceedings.

When determining the status of a whistleblower, the investigator/detective has a wide discretion, which gives rise to corruption risks. The pre-trial investigation agencies still do not have a unified approach to registering criminal proceedings involving whistleblowers, as the relevant information in the Unified Register of Pre-trial Investigations does not usually reflect the participation of a whistleblower in criminal proceedings.

Since the NACP plays a key role in the institutional mechanism for protecting whistleblower rights, the CPC provides for the obligation of the investigator to notify the National Agency in writing of the start of a pre-trial investigation involving a whistleblower after entering the relevant information into the Unified Register of Pre-trial Investigations. At the same time, the NACP is not a party to criminal proceedings and has no authority to assess the investigator's actions or inaction in terms of ensuring the rights and guarantees of whistleblowers.

That is why whistleblowers are hostage to the investigator's subjective vision of their legal status in criminal proceedings, which affects their safety and protection from possible negative measures (dismissal, disciplinary proceedings, etc.) related to their reporting to pre-trial investigation agencies. 

For citizens who have chosen to fight corruption, this has negative consequences, primarily the inability to enjoy "whistleblower immunity." In addition, failure to obtain the status of a whistleblower does not allow such a person to exercise the right to remuneration. 

To solve the problem, it is necessary to introduce a unified concept of a whistleblower, in particular by harmonizing the definition of this term in the CPC (clause 162, part 1, article 3) with the corresponding norm of the Law (paragraph 20, part 1, article 1)

This will introduce a unified approach to the registration and pre-trial investigation of criminal proceedings involving whistleblowers and, accordingly, provide them with protection both within and outside of criminal proceedings.

Within its competence, the NACP is developing the necessary amendments to the legislation and counts on the support of this initiative from the stakeholders. 

Read more about this issue.

Latest News

20.06.2025
15:40
Placement of electronic communications structures and logging on particularly valuable land: NACP recommendations prevented corruption abuses
19.06.2025
14:30
Municipal partnerships - a driver for transparent reconstruction and European integration – Deputy Head of the National Agency on Corruption Prevention
18.06.2025
18:15
Declared cash can be verified through an investigation, a notice of suspicion or a court verdict based on NACP materials
14:20
The Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine has approved methodological recommendations for building integrity in higher education institutions
17.06.2025
15:15
Deputy Head of NACP at Brussels Forum debunked disinformation narratives about corruption in Ukraine
16.06.2025
13:55
The establishment of the lobbying institution: legislative changes will simplify procedures for businesses and delay the application of sanctions
13.06.2025
17:30
Based on NACP recommendations the Ministry of Economy has eliminated corruption risks in the regulation of business grant provision
12.06.2025
18:30
Full audits of declarations in May: NACP found violations worth nearly UAH 518 million
17:45
Sectoral analysis of corruption risks as a basis for future reforms: results of the meeting of the Steering Committee of the Swiss-Ukrainian project ‘Supporting Ukraine in the fight against corruption and asset recovery’
10:30
Half of the respondents rated their interaction with the Register of Declarations as the highest score — research
10.06.2025
16:15
Security and defence authorities, NACP and the NATO Integrity Building Programme agreed on further implementation of Alliance recommendations
14:30
21 apartments, parking spaces and cars: former law enforcement officer - lawyer suspected of corruption based on NACP materials
13:00
Digitalisation, participation and clear laws: Deputy Head of the NACP on anti-corruption safeguards in reconstruction
09.06.2025
14:40
UAH 12 million of illegal assets: former official of the Logistics Command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine suspected of corruption based on NACP materials
14:06
Over UAH 8 million may be confiscated from Chernihiv tax official based on NACP and SBI materials
12:30
New anti-corruption safeguards in land relations, taxation and academic integrity: implementation of state anti-corruption policy in the first quarter
06.06.2025
15:38
The number of court decisions in favour of whistleblowers increased by 56% - NACP analysis
15:15
Lobbying in Ukraine: development of transparency register ongoing
14:45
Civil forfeiture: over UAH 5.6 million may be confiscated from the former head of the Rivne Regional Council based on NACP and the State Bureau of Investigation materials
12:30
The Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine has approved a guide for heads of schools entitled ‘Educational Navigator’
Чат-бот Telegram
contact center
Чат-бот Telegram
Contacts
+38 (044) 200-06-94 info@nazk.gov.ua
працює з 9:00 до 18:00
Технічна підтримка
support@nazk.gov.ua