NACP NACP
A-
A
A+
A
A
Звичайна версія сайту

Development of the institution of whistleblowing: how to legislate the status of a whistleblower in criminal proceedings?  

27.03.2024
6ab80291bfeeb53f0dabc4ad83a5c9ec178592a5f578c046097277e7b270aa05-900x400

Differences in the definition of corruption whistleblowers in the current legislation prevent the formation of a unified approach to working with this category of persons, and proper protection of their rights and guarantees. According to the State Anti-Corruption Program (clause 1.6.3.3.1.) in order to solve this problem, the National Agency on Corruption Prevention (NACP) should develop a draft law that, in particular, provides for the introduction of a broad definition of "whistleblower".  

Thus, in the national legislation, the term "whistleblower" is defined in the Law of Ukraine "On Prevention of Corruption" (hereinafter - the Law) and the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine (hereinafter - the CPC).

The Law defines a whistleblower as a person who has reported facts of corruption that became known to him or her under certain conditions, namely in connection with his or her labor, professional, economic, public, scientific activities, service or training, or his or her participation in procedures provided for by law that are mandatory for the commencement of such activities, service or training.

At the same time, according to the CPC, a whistleblower is a person who has filed a statement or report of a corruption criminal offense with a pre-trial investigation body.

As it can be seen, the CPC of Ukraine does not duplicate the definition of "whistleblower" and does not contain a mandatory condition on the list of sources from which the whistleblower can learn information about corruption (labor, professional, economic, social, scientific activities, etc.). In other words, in this case, the legislator defines a whistleblower as a complainant in criminal proceedings.

However, the status of a whistleblower does not correspond to the essence of a whistleblower, and narrows his or her rights and obligations, as well as guarantees. 

The applicant's rights defined in the CPC fully apply to the whistleblower, and the applicant who is a whistleblower additionally has the right to receive information on the status of the pre-trial investigation initiated upon his or her application or report. In practice, however, it is quite difficult for a whistleblower to obtain any information on the status of the pre-trial investigation in criminal proceedings.

When determining the status of a whistleblower, the investigator/detective has a wide discretion, which gives rise to corruption risks. The pre-trial investigation agencies still do not have a unified approach to registering criminal proceedings involving whistleblowers, as the relevant information in the Unified Register of Pre-trial Investigations does not usually reflect the participation of a whistleblower in criminal proceedings.

Since the NACP plays a key role in the institutional mechanism for protecting whistleblower rights, the CPC provides for the obligation of the investigator to notify the National Agency in writing of the start of a pre-trial investigation involving a whistleblower after entering the relevant information into the Unified Register of Pre-trial Investigations. At the same time, the NACP is not a party to criminal proceedings and has no authority to assess the investigator's actions or inaction in terms of ensuring the rights and guarantees of whistleblowers.

That is why whistleblowers are hostage to the investigator's subjective vision of their legal status in criminal proceedings, which affects their safety and protection from possible negative measures (dismissal, disciplinary proceedings, etc.) related to their reporting to pre-trial investigation agencies. 

For citizens who have chosen to fight corruption, this has negative consequences, primarily the inability to enjoy "whistleblower immunity." In addition, failure to obtain the status of a whistleblower does not allow such a person to exercise the right to remuneration. 

To solve the problem, it is necessary to introduce a unified concept of a whistleblower, in particular by harmonizing the definition of this term in the CPC (clause 162, part 1, article 3) with the corresponding norm of the Law (paragraph 20, part 1, article 1)

This will introduce a unified approach to the registration and pre-trial investigation of criminal proceedings involving whistleblowers and, accordingly, provide them with protection both within and outside of criminal proceedings.

Within its competence, the NACP is developing the necessary amendments to the legislation and counts on the support of this initiative from the stakeholders. 

Read more about this issue.

Latest News

27.06.2025
16:45
Lifestyle monitoring: former deputy head of the Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine suspected of illegal enrichment
15:00
The Government, NACP and implementing agencies discussed progress and challenges in implementing the State Anti-Corruption Programme by the end of 2025
26.06.2025
17:30
Full audits of declarations: indictment against an official of the State Service of Ukraine for Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre in the Kyiv region referred to court
15:15
Full audits of declarations: former deputy mayor of Dnipro informed of suspicion of illegal enrichment and false declarations
25.06.2025
18:00
Full audits of declarations: former member of the village council in Sumy region charged with criminal liability for false statements in his declaration
16:30
NACP, together with the OECD, held bilateral consultations engaging more than 40 state institutions within the fifth round of monitoring in Ukraine
24.06.2025
12:09
Civil forfeiture: Based on NACP materials, the High Anti-Corruption Court has confiscated over UAH 8.5 million from a couple of customs officers and their son, a district council official, in favour of the state.
23.06.2025
19:30
UAH 7.8 million will be confiscated from a Kharkiv police officer and transferred to the state budget based on NACP materials: decision of the Appeals Chamber of the High Anti-Corruption Court
15:10
How the NACP protects whistleblowers: Legal guarantees and practice
20.06.2025
17:00
Lifestyle monitoring: The Security Service of Ukraine and the Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine have sent to court an indictment against a military commissar from Bucha for illegal enrichment of over UAH 21 million
15:40
Placement of electronic communications structures and logging on particularly valuable land: NACP recommendations prevented corruption abuses
19.06.2025
14:30
Municipal partnerships - a driver for transparent reconstruction and European integration – Deputy Head of the National Agency on Corruption Prevention
18.06.2025
18:15
Declared cash can be verified through an investigation, a notice of suspicion or a court verdict based on NACP materials
14:20
The Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine has approved methodological recommendations for building integrity in higher education institutions
17.06.2025
15:15
Deputy Head of NACP at Brussels Forum debunked disinformation narratives about corruption in Ukraine
16.06.2025
13:55
The establishment of the lobbying institution: legislative changes will simplify procedures for businesses and delay the application of sanctions
13.06.2025
17:30
Based on NACP recommendations the Ministry of Economy has eliminated corruption risks in the regulation of business grant provision
12.06.2025
18:30
Full audits of declarations in May: NACP found violations worth nearly UAH 518 million
17:45
Sectoral analysis of corruption risks as a basis for future reforms: results of the meeting of the Steering Committee of the Swiss-Ukrainian project ‘Supporting Ukraine in the fight against corruption and asset recovery’
10:30
Half of the respondents rated their interaction with the Register of Declarations as the highest score — research
Чат-бот Telegram
contact center
Чат-бот Telegram
Contacts
+38 (044) 200-06-94 info@nazk.gov.ua
працює з 9:00 до 18:00
Технічна підтримка
support@nazk.gov.ua