How the NACP protects whistleblowers: Legal guarantees and practice

23.06.2025

23 June is World Whistleblower Day. Whistleblowers are the first to uncover corruption schemes from within, but they often face pressure, persecution or unlawful dismissal. Therefore, the NACP works systematically to ensure comprehensive protection of their rights.

In accordance with Article 53 of the Law of Ukraine ‘On Prevention of Corruption,’ whistleblowers are entitled to state protection in the event of a threat of negative measures related to reporting possible facts of corruption. Such measures include, in particular:

  • dismissal or coercion to resign;
  • transfer without the employee's consent;
  • reduction of salary;
  • other forms of unfavourable influence by the employer.

These guarantees also apply to the whistleblower's close relatives if a causal link is established between the report of corruption and the relevant actions. At the same time, the law does not provide absolute immunity from disciplinary or other liability for deliberate violations of labour discipline or legislation.

Competence of the NACP in the field of whistleblower protection

The National Agency implements a set of measures to enforce legal protection mechanisms for whistleblowers:

  • investigates circumstances that may indicate persecution in connection with reporting corruption;
  • based on the results of investigations, issues orders requiring the elimination of violations and bringing those responsible to justice;
  • provides advisory explanations to whistleblowers;
  • represents their interests in court proceedings;
  • coordinates interaction with authorised persons on corruption prevention issues;
  • monitors the implementation of the law on whistleblower protection on an ongoing basis and conducts an annual analysis and review of state policy in this area.

Statistics for 2024 show that the NACP has been active in protecting whistleblowers. The Agency received 46 requests for protection of whistleblowers. It is important to note that only in 16 cases was their status confirmed, which highlights the need for requests to meet the legal criteria. In 30 cases, the rights and guarantees of whistleblower protection did not apply to the individuals concerned. During its inspections, NACP sent seven warning letters to the employers of whistleblowers to prevent violations of the law.

In total, in 2024, NACP initiated 13 protective or restorative measures and, in 12 cases, applied sanctions or other legal remedies against the persecution of whistleblowers. Five whistleblowers were reinstated in their positions through the courts.

Let us consider some successful cases where the NACP helped whistleblowers restore justice.

Revocation of the order to dismiss an authorised person following a report of corruption

An official responsible for implementing the company's anti-corruption programme was dismissed without the consent of the NACP, with disciplinary action taken against him as a result of his reporting of corruption. The disciplinary action was applied selectively.

The court of first instance upheld the whistleblower's claim, but the court of appeal overturned this decision. The Supreme Court, having considered the cassation appeals of the NACP and the whistleblower's representative, emphasised that the dismissal of the authorised person without the consent of the NACP was a violation of the law, and that the application of selective negative measures against the whistleblower, even if formally lawful, was inadmissible.

Reinstatement and compensation for unlawful dismissal

An employee of one of the State Fisheries Protection Service's departments was unlawfully dismissed for whistleblowing. NACP acted as a third party, providing support to the whistleblower.

The court ruled in favour of the whistleblower, overturning the dismissal order, ordering his immediate reinstatement, the calculation and payment of his average earnings for the entire period of forced absence, and the payment of compensation for moral damage from the employer.

Protection of a whistleblower's close relative

After the whistleblower reported false information in the declaration of one of the officials to the NACP, which led to the opening of criminal proceedings, a close relative of the whistleblower, who worked as a school director, received a reprimand. NACP and the court intervened in the situation. The court clearly established a link between the reprimand and the whistleblower's report, recognised the disciplinary order as unlawful, overturned it and ordered the offender to compensate for moral damage.

These examples prove that the NACP really protects those who report corruption.

We would like to remind you that whistleblowers can also turn to the authorised person responsible for preventing corruption in their organisation, the court, and centres providing free legal aid to protect and restore their rights.

For more information on whistleblowing, please follow the link.

Latest News

08.10.2025
15:38
Transparency Register: the most popular lobbying areas are economic development, regulatory, legal, financial, tax, and customs policies
06.10.2025
17:24
Lifestyle Monitoring: Results for the Third Quarter of 2025
03.10.2025
16:01
OECD monitoring team noted Ukraine’s progress in the field of anti-corruption policy – report details
15:30
Results of control over the completeness of declaration filing: violations of financial control requirements totaling over UAH 180 million were identified
02.10.2025
17:45
MPs as sole proprietors: NACP revealed numerous violations in declarations amounting to tens of millions of hryvnias
17:30
Lifestyle monitoring: nearly UAH 3 million may be recovered to the state from an official of the Strategic Investigations Department in Odesa region
17:15
Who cannot be a lobbyist in Ukraine: restrictions of the Law “On Lobbying”
15:00
Victor Pavlushchyk: Political neutrality of the NACP is the key to the trust of citizens and international partners
30.09.2025
18:30
Hromadske, in cooperation with NACP and EUACI, released a documentary film about anti-corruption in Ukraine
12:17
Further cooperation between NATO's Representation to Ukraine and NACP will be strengthened — Tim Pollmeier during a meeting with the Head of NACP
26.09.2025
14:46
Ukraine’s progress in preventing and combating corruption: results of the fifth round of evaluation under the OECD Istanbul Anti-Corruption Action Plan have been published
24.09.2025
16:15
Full audits: a former MP from Lviv region has been served with a notice of suspicion for false asset declaration
23.09.2025
17:47
Lifestyle monitoring: a land management deputy of Brovary district is accused of illegal enrichment of nearly UAH 30 million
15:15
Full audits of asset declarations: director of a municipal enterprise from Rivne notified of suspicion of false declaration
12:30
Civil confiscation: almost 60% of HACC decisions are based on NACP materials
19.09.2025
16:30
Anti-Corruption Communication: Lessons and New Challenges in 2025
15:00
Lobbying vs Corruption: What’s the Difference
17.09.2025
18:00
Assets worth UAH 1.6 million were recovered to the state budget from a prosecutor of the Office of the Prosecutor General based on NACP materials
16.09.2025
18:45
Tax reform: implementation of anti-corruption mechanisms discussed at NACP
16:06
Anti-Corruption Expertise: NACP provided recommendations to eliminate corruption risks in the areas of housing for internally displaced persons, property relations and reintegration of defenders
Чат-бот Telegram
contact center
Чат-бот Telegram
Contacts
+38 (044) 200-06-94 info@nazk.gov.ua
працює з 9:00 до 18:00
Технічна підтримка
support@nazk.gov.ua