How the NACP protects whistleblowers: Legal guarantees and practice

23.06.2025

23 June is World Whistleblower Day. Whistleblowers are the first to uncover corruption schemes from within, but they often face pressure, persecution or unlawful dismissal. Therefore, the NACP works systematically to ensure comprehensive protection of their rights.

In accordance with Article 53 of the Law of Ukraine ‘On Prevention of Corruption,’ whistleblowers are entitled to state protection in the event of a threat of negative measures related to reporting possible facts of corruption. Such measures include, in particular:

  • dismissal or coercion to resign;
  • transfer without the employee's consent;
  • reduction of salary;
  • other forms of unfavourable influence by the employer.

These guarantees also apply to the whistleblower's close relatives if a causal link is established between the report of corruption and the relevant actions. At the same time, the law does not provide absolute immunity from disciplinary or other liability for deliberate violations of labour discipline or legislation.

Competence of the NACP in the field of whistleblower protection

The National Agency implements a set of measures to enforce legal protection mechanisms for whistleblowers:

  • investigates circumstances that may indicate persecution in connection with reporting corruption;
  • based on the results of investigations, issues orders requiring the elimination of violations and bringing those responsible to justice;
  • provides advisory explanations to whistleblowers;
  • represents their interests in court proceedings;
  • coordinates interaction with authorised persons on corruption prevention issues;
  • monitors the implementation of the law on whistleblower protection on an ongoing basis and conducts an annual analysis and review of state policy in this area.

Statistics for 2024 show that the NACP has been active in protecting whistleblowers. The Agency received 46 requests for protection of whistleblowers. It is important to note that only in 16 cases was their status confirmed, which highlights the need for requests to meet the legal criteria. In 30 cases, the rights and guarantees of whistleblower protection did not apply to the individuals concerned. During its inspections, NACP sent seven warning letters to the employers of whistleblowers to prevent violations of the law.

In total, in 2024, NACP initiated 13 protective or restorative measures and, in 12 cases, applied sanctions or other legal remedies against the persecution of whistleblowers. Five whistleblowers were reinstated in their positions through the courts.

Let us consider some successful cases where the NACP helped whistleblowers restore justice.

Revocation of the order to dismiss an authorised person following a report of corruption

An official responsible for implementing the company's anti-corruption programme was dismissed without the consent of the NACP, with disciplinary action taken against him as a result of his reporting of corruption. The disciplinary action was applied selectively.

The court of first instance upheld the whistleblower's claim, but the court of appeal overturned this decision. The Supreme Court, having considered the cassation appeals of the NACP and the whistleblower's representative, emphasised that the dismissal of the authorised person without the consent of the NACP was a violation of the law, and that the application of selective negative measures against the whistleblower, even if formally lawful, was inadmissible.

Reinstatement and compensation for unlawful dismissal

An employee of one of the State Fisheries Protection Service's departments was unlawfully dismissed for whistleblowing. NACP acted as a third party, providing support to the whistleblower.

The court ruled in favour of the whistleblower, overturning the dismissal order, ordering his immediate reinstatement, the calculation and payment of his average earnings for the entire period of forced absence, and the payment of compensation for moral damage from the employer.

Protection of a whistleblower's close relative

After the whistleblower reported false information in the declaration of one of the officials to the NACP, which led to the opening of criminal proceedings, a close relative of the whistleblower, who worked as a school director, received a reprimand. NACP and the court intervened in the situation. The court clearly established a link between the reprimand and the whistleblower's report, recognised the disciplinary order as unlawful, overturned it and ordered the offender to compensate for moral damage.

These examples prove that the NACP really protects those who report corruption.

We would like to remind you that whistleblowers can also turn to the authorised person responsible for preventing corruption in their organisation, the court, and centres providing free legal aid to protect and restore their rights.

For more information on whistleblowing, please follow the link.

Latest News

30.10.2025
17:51
Growing challenges and unchanged staffing: why the NACP needs to strengthen its institutional capacity
29.10.2025
12:30
The NACP and EUACI have developed a universal methodology for assessing the integrity of municipal enterprises
28.10.2025
17:45
How reports of corruption are reviewed: why not every signal becomes the basis for further verification
16:50
The IMF and the World Bank support Ukraine in strengthening its anti-corruption system: results of the NACP team’s working visit to the United States
27.10.2025
13:30
Lobbying: administrative liability for illegal activities and violations of legislation in this field
24.10.2025
17:15
Ukraine has moved closer to international standards of business integrity - OECD assessment results
14:45
Ukraine and Moldova deepen cooperation in the field of corruption prevention: NACP and ANI signed a memorandum of cooperation
22.10.2025
18:45
Full audits of declarations: Mayor of Pervomaisk notified of suspicion for false asset declaration
17:00
Reform of the Medical and Social Expert Commission: NACP calls for further improvement of the procedure for determining disability
20.10.2025
15:18
Anti-corruption compliance is a fundamental requirement for businesses participating in public procurement or attracting foreign investments – Head of the NACP at CSPF-2025
14:15
What is the difference between a conflict of interest in lobbying and a conflict of interest of a public official?
17.10.2025
15:30
Ukraine demonstrates steady progress in the field of whistleblower protection – conclusions within the framework of the 5th round of OECD monitoring
15.10.2025
18:30
Head of the NACP at the OGP: Ukraine demonstrates that even in times of war, it is possible to implement innovative accountability mechanisms to strengthen integrity
15:18
Transfer of Ministry of Defense of Ukraine developments to verified companies for serial production: government approves resolution taking into account all NACP recommendations
12:15
NACP at the Donbas Media Forum: transparency of reconstruction and the role of investigative journalism in the regions
14.10.2025
18:15
Road salt with a markup of UAH 2 million: law enforcement officials notify a Kyiv city state administration officer of suspicion based on NACP materials
16:15
Changes to the procedure for full audit: what now counts as “false” and “inaccurate” information, new grounds for suspension and termination of audit, protection of declarants’ rights
11:30
Ukraine improves mechanisms for preventing conflicts of interest and financial control instruments - OECD assessment results
11:28
Subject of lobbying: what a lobbyist can influence and what exceptions are provided
13.10.2025
15:30
NACP presents the strategy for the development of integrity in education for 2026–2030
Чат-бот Telegram
contact center
Чат-бот Telegram
Contacts
+38 (044) 200-06-94 info@nazk.gov.ua
працює з 9:00 до 18:00
Технічна підтримка
support@nazk.gov.ua