NACP NACP
A-
A
A+
A
A
Звичайна версія сайту

Regarding the letter from the Presidents of the Venice Commission and GRECO to the Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada on the constitutional crisis in Ukraine

01.11.2020
Regarding the letter from the Presidents of the Venice Commission and GRECO to the Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada on the constitutional crisis in Ukraine
Yesterday, October 31, the Council of Europe published an official letter from the President of the Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) Marin Mrčela and the President of the Venice Commission Gianni Buquicchio to the Speaker of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Dmytro Razumkov regarding the last ruling of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine (CCU).   When deciding on the rapid recovery of the anti-corruption system, all the stakeholders should consider that it is not possible to provide it if the CCU’s ruling remains unchanged. Thus, in this situation it is necessary to consider the following three aspects: 1. In its ruling, the CCU violated the Constitution of Ukraine at least twice:
  • The CCU interfered with the powers of the Parliament, noting that the establishment of criminal liability for declaring knowingly inaccurate information, as well as intentional failure to submit a declaration is an excessive punishment for committing these offenses. According to the Constitution of Ukraine, only the legislative branch of government can determine which action should be considered as a crime.
This means that it is impossible to restore criminal liability for declaring inaccurate information and restore the equality of all branches of government by adopting a new law. Any law that would return criminal liability should automatically be considered unconstitutional, taking into account the ruling of the CCU.
  • According to the Constitution, all branches of government should act exclusively within their powers, in the manner and on the grounds provided by the Constitution itself and the laws of Ukraine.
According to the Constitution and laws of Ukraine, the CCU could issue a ruling only within the provisions of the legislation on the prevention of corruption, which were challenged in the constitutional petition. However, the judges violated the requirements of the Constitution and canceled the provisions of the Law of Ukraine “On Prevention of Corruption”, which were not challenged in the constitutional petition of the 47 members of Parliament. 2. The fundamental principles of law prohibit being a judge in one’s own cause. Some of the judges acted in their own interests while considering the case.  Three judges – Volodymyr Moysyk, Ihor Slidenko, and Iryna Zavhorodnia – could be brought to administrative and criminal responsibility by the canceled legal provisions. They were aware of this fact, however, did not file an objection and canceled the mentioned provisions. On the day when the ruling was issued, the National Agency on Corruption Prevention (NACP) announced that the other judge – Serhii Holovatyi – did not declare the property worth  UAH 3.6 million (~$126,500). He also was aware of this fact at the time of participation in the hearing. By issuing the ruling, the CCU suspended the work of the NAPC, revoking its powers, and allowing the thousands of other public officials to avoid the responsibility. 3. The CCU noted that NACP should not be responsible for monitoring judges’ filling the declarations and conflicts of interest on the same grounds as it does with other public officials. This contradicts the previous conclusions of the Venice Commission on a similar issue. In the opinion on the amendments to the judicial code and some other laws in Armenia, the Venice Commission notes that the verification of judges’ declarations by a body outside the judiciary is a better solution than the development of a special body within the judiciary. “Two solutions are possible in this respect: either to create a special body within the judiciary responsible for checking financial declarations of judges or to entrust this task to an external body which deals with the declarations of all public officials. The first solution is better for judicial independence but lacks transparency, which may give rise to a corporatist behaviour. So, the drafters of the Package preferred the second model: it is the CPC which checks the financial declarations of judges on an equal footing with other State officials and which has now the power to start disciplinary proceedings against judges”, the opinion says. It should be added that in its reports GRECO positively assesses the Ukrainian declaration system. “GRECO appreciates that legal and regulatory measures have been taken to improve the control of financial declarations and to provide for appeal channels”, GRECO notes in its Fourth Round Compliance Report on Ukraine. “It is also positive that illicit enrichment has been re-criminalised…”, the Report says. Although GRECO’s compliance reports have a special section called  “Corruption prevention in respect of judges”, there are no recommendations for setting up a separate body to collect, store and verify their declarations.
Regarding the letter from the Presidents of the Venice Commission and GRECO to the Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada on the constitutional crisis in Ukraine

Latest News

10.07.2025
08:45
Ukraine has demonstrated significant progress in preventing and combating corruption - results of the 5th round of evaluation under the OECD Istanbul Anti-Corruption Action Plan
09.07.2025
18:45
Conflict of interest: protocols, substantiated conclusions and orders for June 2025
16:00
Full audits of declarations: case against the village heads of Khotianivka and Oseshchyna in the Vyshhorod City Council for false declarations referred to court
07.07.2025
15:32
Ukraine and Poland deepen cooperation in the field of corruption prevention: Memorandum signed between NACP and CBA
04.07.2025
16:10
Lifestyle monitoring: top official of the State Enterprise ‘Forests of Ukraine’ suspected of illegal enrichment and declaring false information
03.07.2025
15:45
NACP and WWF strengthen partnership for systematic anti-corruption efforts in natural resource management
15:30
Lifestyle monitoring: over UAH 5 million to be confiscated for the state budget from an official of the State Migration Service, following a decision by the Appeals Chamber of the High Anti-Corruption Court
12:15
NACP, the Defence Procurement Agency and the State Logistics Operator presented progress in implementing transparency, integrity and accountability mechanisms in defence procurement
02.07.2025
12:45
Full audits of declarations: former deputy of the Kharkiv Regional Council notified of suspicion of false declarations based on NACP materials
11:00
NACP launched an updated version of the POLITDATA 2.0 register
01.07.2025
16:33
Full audits of declarations: The State Bureau of Investigation has notified the former deputy head of the Khmelnytskyi Regional Prosecutor's Office of suspicion of declaring false information
27.06.2025
16:45
Lifestyle monitoring: former deputy head of the Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine suspected of illegal enrichment
15:00
The Government, NACP and implementing agencies discussed progress and challenges in implementing the State Anti-Corruption Programme by the end of 2025
26.06.2025
17:30
Full audits of declarations: indictment against an official of the State Service of Ukraine for Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre in the Kyiv region referred to court
15:15
Full audits of declarations: former deputy mayor of Dnipro informed of suspicion of illegal enrichment and false declarations
25.06.2025
18:00
Full audits of declarations: former member of the village council in Sumy region charged with criminal liability for false statements in his declaration
16:30
NACP, together with the OECD, held bilateral consultations engaging more than 40 state institutions within the fifth round of monitoring in Ukraine
24.06.2025
12:09
Civil forfeiture: Based on NACP materials, the High Anti-Corruption Court has confiscated over UAH 8.5 million from a couple of customs officers and their son, a district council official, in favour of the state.
23.06.2025
19:30
UAH 7.8 million will be confiscated from a Kharkiv police officer and transferred to the state budget based on NACP materials: decision of the Appeals Chamber of the High Anti-Corruption Court
15:10
How the NACP protects whistleblowers: Legal guarantees and practice
Чат-бот Telegram
contact center
Чат-бот Telegram
Contacts
+38 (044) 200-06-94 info@nazk.gov.ua
працює з 9:00 до 18:00
Технічна підтримка
support@nazk.gov.ua